Karl Barth and the Analogia EntisA&C Black, 17 giu 2010 - 244 pagine Many interpreters argue that Karl Barth's rejection of the Roman Catholic analogia entis was based upon a mistaken interpretation of the principle, and many scholars also contend that late in his career, Barth changed his mind about the analogia entis, either by withdrawing his rejection of it or by adopting some form of it as his own. This book challenges both views, and by doing so, it opens up new avenues for ecumenical dialogue between Protestants and Roman Catholics. In short, this book establishes that Barth did not make a mistake when he rejected the analogia entis and that he also never wavered on his critique of it; he did, however, change his response to it-not by breaking with his earlier thought, but by deepening it so that a true Christological dialogue could take place between Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians. This conclusion will be used to point the way to new terrain for ecumenical dialogue in contemporary discussions. |
Sommario
1 Introduction | 1 |
2 The Background to the Debate | 13 |
3 Incarnation and Analogy | 51 |
4 The Nature of Barths Rejection of the analogia entis | 83 |
5 Przywaras Analogia Entis and the Invention of the AntiChrist | 122 |
6 Barths analogia fidei and Its Implications | 158 |
7 Analogy in Covenant | 191 |
8 Conclusion | 231 |
236 | |
243 | |
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Parole e frasi comuni
action analogia entis analogia fidei Aquinas argues argument Augustine Balthasar basis becomes believes Catholic Church Christian claim clear continuity correspondence course covenant created creation creature criticism critique discussion distinction divine doctrine Dogmatics Erich Przywara essence event explains fact faith first follows formulations given God’s act God’s revelation grace ground Holy Spirit human existence Ibid idea important insights interpretation Jesus Christ Karl Barth knowledge later leads lectures means metaphysics move nature notes notion object occurs offered ofthe participation philosophy Polarity position possibility precisely principle problem Protestant provides Przywara Przywara’s analogia entis question reading reality reason reflection Reformed rejection relation relationship Religionsphilosophie remains response result Roman Catholic says seen seminar sense shows similarity simply Sohngen Specifically stands takes talk tension theologian theology things thinking thought tion tradition true truth turn understanding