Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A Reasonable Way to Handle ConflictJohn Benjamins Publishing, 2011 - 291 pagine The context of mediation immediately highlights the importance of argumentation as a means to reasonably handle conflict. "Argumentation in dispute mediation" tackles this topic providing both theoretical insights and detailed empirical argumentative analysis. Its goal is twofold: to explore mediation as a real-life context of argumentation and to show how an increased argumentative awareness could improve conflict resolution.Particular emphasis is accorded to mapping mediation through an interdisciplinary reasoned review of existing accounts. The outline of a conceptual framework of mediation constitutes a solid basis for the study of argumentation in mediation. The argumentative analysis of a corpus of mediation cases, based on the pragma-dialectical account and the Argumentum Model of Topics, shows the mediator s moves which actually help conflicting parties discuss reasonably. The mediator s topical potential plays a crucial role in this relation at the levels of issue selection, evoking of cultural-contextual premises and choice of argument schemes." |
Sommario
Chapter 1 Argumentation in mediation | 1 |
Chapter 2 Mediation as a context of argumentative interactions | 13 |
Chapter 3 Mapping mediation | 49 |
Chapter 4 Towards an ontologyoriented conceptual framework of mediation | 79 |
Chapter 5 The argumentative perspective | 113 |
Chapter 6 Results of the argumentative analysis | 147 |
Conclusive remarks | 257 |
| 269 | |
List of interviewed professionals | 285 |
| 287 | |
| 289 | |
The Argumentation in Context series | 292 |
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A reasonable way to handle conflict Sara Greco Morasso Anteprima limitata - 2011 |
Parole e frasi comuni
academic ADR practices alternative dispute resolution approach arbor porphyriana argumentation theory argumentative analysis argumentative discussion aspects boundaries Chapter co-arguers conceptual concerns conflict resolution confrontation stage considered constitute context contraposition core process corpus critical discussion difference of opinion dispute mediation dispute resolution dynamics emerges endoxa endoxon example fact framework of mediation goal Greco Morasso Haynes Herrman Hollett Houtlosser ibid identified interac interaction field interaction scheme interests interpersonal relationship interpreted intervention involved issue locus from termination means mediation process mediator’s mentation Minor Premise move negotiation Okay ombudsman ontology opening stage options outcomes particular parties perspective phase Philip possible pragma-dialectical pragmatic predicates present problem process of mediation proposed questions reasonable Rebbe reconstruction relation relationship relevant resolution practices Rigotti Rocci role Section solution specific speech acts Standifer standpoint strategic manoeuvring studies termination and setting Therese third neutral tion topical potential turn understand University of Lugano