Immagini della pagina
PDF
ePub

opinion, is easily accounted for. No book was ever, perhaps, more generally opposed at its first appearance, or more pertinaciously answered during the period when it filled the public eye. None but scholars of some standing were well qualified to judge of the merits of the proofs which our Author brought from antiquity; and none but the clergy of the Established church were, at the time, competent to give his views of the Connexion of church and state the password to public favour. These views, however, like the arguments by which he maintained his principal proposition, were in some degree the views of the adversaries of the Establishment; and the clergy, of course, regarded him in the light, either of a rash and wilful adventurer, or of a traitor to their cause; while those Dissenters who professed to follow a purer model of Christian worship, were both disgusted at his cavalier treatment of them, and alarmed by observing with what a hasty hand he disposed of some of the main points of their faith.

CONTENTS OF VOLUME FIRST.

73

76

79

: 111

PROVES THE NECESSITY OF THE DOCTRINES OF A FUTURE STATE OF REWARDS AND
PUNISHMENTS TO CIVIL SOCIETY, FROM THE NATURE OF THE THING,
SECT. I.-The Introduction, the nature of internal evidence; the occasion of this
discourse, and the proposition,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

113

113

SECT. II. Of the origin of civil society; the causes of its defective plan: that this
defect can be only supplied by religion: that religion, under the present dispensation
of providence, cannot subsist without the doctrine of a future state of rewards and
punishments; therefore that doctrine necessary to civil society,

SECT. III.-The arguments of those who deny the necessity of religion to society
considered: Pomponatius falsely ranked in that number, and vindicated: Cardan
characterized and censured,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

SECT. IV. and V.-Mr Bayle, the great defender of this paradox in his apology for
atheism, examined. His arguments collected, methodized, and confuted.
course of this disputation, the true foundation of morality inquired into, and shown
to be neither the essential difference of things, nor the moral sense, but the will of
God. The causes of the contrary errors shown: and the objections against morali-
ty's being founded in the will of God, answered,

SECT. VI. The Author of the Fable of the Bees, who contends that it is Vice, and

not Virtue, that is useful to society, examined, exposed, and confuted,

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]

PROVES THE NECESSITY OF THE DOCTRINE OF A FUTURE STATE TO SOCIETY, FROM THE
CONDUCT OF THE ANCIENT LAWGIVERS, AND FOUNDERS OF CIVIL POLICY,
SECT. I.-The magistrate's care in cultivating
sality of it, amongst all civil policied nations.
both with regard to the nature of their gods, the attributes assigned to them, and
the mode of worship in civil use amongst them,

religion, shown, 1. From the univer-
2. From the genius of pagan religion,

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

PROVES THE NECESSITY OF THE DOCTRINE OF A FUTURE STATE TO SOCIETY, FROM

THE OPINION AND CONDUCT OF THE ANCIENT SAGES AND PHILOSOPHERS.

SECT. I.-Testimonies of ancient sages and philosophers, concerning the necessity of

the doctrine of a future state to civil society,

SECT. II. That none of the ancient philosophers believed the doctrine of a future

state of rewards and punishments, though, on account of its confessed necessity to

the support of religion, and consequently of civil society, all the theistical philoso-

phers sedulously taught it to the people. The several senses in which the ancients

conceived the permanency of the human soul explained. Several general reasons

premised, to show that the ancient philosophers did not always believe what they

taught, and that they taught the doctrine of a future state of rewards and punish-

ments without believing it: Where the principles that induced the ancient sages to

make it lawful to deceive for public good, in matters of religion, are explained,

whereby they are seen to be such as had no place in the propagation or genius of the

Jewish and Christian religions. In the course of this inquiry, the rise, progress,

perfection, decline, and genius of the ancient Greek philosophy, under its several

divisions, are considered and explained,

SECT. III.-Enters on a particular inquiry into the sentiments of each sect of philo-

sophy on this point. The division and succession of their schools. The character

of Socrates; and of the new and old academy. The character and genius of each

sect of the grand quaternion of theistic philosophy, the Pythagoric, the Platonic, the

peripatetic, and the stoic: showing that not one of these believed the doctrine of a

future state of rewards and punishments. The character of Tully, and his senti-

ments on this point. The original of the ancient fables, and of the doctrines of the

metempsychosis and metamorphosis, occasionally inquired into and explained,

[ocr errors]

SECT. IV. Shows, in order to a fuller conviction, that the ancient philosophers not
only did not, but that they could not possibly believe a future state of rewards and
punishments, because two metaphysical principles, concerning the nature of God,
and of the human soul, which entirely overturn the doctrine of a future state of re-
wards and punishments, were universally held and believed by all the Greek philo-
sophers. These doctrines examined and explained. In the course of this inquiry,
the true genius of the ancient Egyptian wisdom explained; and their pretended
philosophy, as delivered by the latter Greek writers, shown to be spurious. The
section concludes with the use to be made of this remarkable fact, of the ancient
philosophers not believing, and yet sedulously teaching, a future state of rewards and
punishments, for the support of our main question,

SECT. V. This account of the ancient philosophy, so far from being prejudicial to
Christianity, that it greatly credits and recommends it. Proved from the mischiefs
that attend those different representations of paganism, in the two extremes, which
the defenders of religion are accustomed to make: where it is shown that the differ-
ence, in point of perfection, between the ancient and modern systems of morality,
is entirely owing to Christianity,

[ocr errors]

SECT. VI. The atheistical pretence of religion's being an invention of statesmen,
and therefore false, clearly confuted, and shown to be both impertinent and false.
For that, were the atheist's account of religion right, it would not follow that religion
was false, but the contrary. But the pretence false and groundless, religion having
existed before the civil magistrate was in being,

APPENDIX and NOTES to the Third Book,

Dedication of Books iv. v. vi., in 1765, to Lord Mansfield,

Dedication to the First Edition of Books iv. v. vi., in 1740-to the Jews,

Preface to the First Edition, in 1740,

Preface to the Edition of 1758,

PAGE

494

535

538

.

. 587

. 629

. 637

647
652

BOOK IV.

PROVES THE HIGH ANTIQUITY OF THE ARTS AND EMPIRE OF EGYPT; AND THAT SUCH
HIGH ANTIQUITY ILLUSTRATES AND CONFIRMS THE TRUTH OF THE MOSAIC HISTORY.
SECT. I.-Introduction, showing that the universal pretence to revelation, proves the
truth of some, and particularly of the Jewish,
SECT. II.-Enters on the third proposition. Some general reflections on the high
antiquity of Egypt; and of the equal extravagance of both parties in their attempts
to advance or depress that antiquity,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

676

682

« IndietroContinua »