Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis
A&C Black, 17 giu 2010 - 244 pagine
Many interpreters argue that Karl Barth's rejection of the Roman Catholic analogia entis was based upon a mistaken interpretation of the principle, and many scholars also contend that late in his career, Barth changed his mind about the analogia entis, either by withdrawing his rejection of it or by adopting some form of it as his own. This book challenges both views, and by doing so, it opens up new avenues for ecumenical dialogue between Protestants and Roman Catholics. In short, this book establishes that Barth did not make a mistake when he rejected the analogia entis and that he also never wavered on his critique of it; he did, however, change his response to it-not by breaking with his earlier thought, but by deepening it so that a true Christological dialogue could take place between Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians. This conclusion will be used to point the way to new terrain for ecumenical dialogue in contemporary discussions.
Cosa dicono le persone - Scrivi una recensione
Nessuna recensione trovata nei soliti posti.
2 The Background to the Debate
3 Incarnation and Analogy
4 The Nature of Barths Rejection of the analogia entis
5 Przywaras Analogia Entis and the Invention of the AntiChrist
6 Barths analogia fidei and Its Implications
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
11 Ibid act of creation analogia attributionis analogia ﬁdei argument Augustine Balthasar Barth believes Barth says Barth’s account Barth’s rejection Barth’s theology Barth’s view basis Catholic Church CD III/2 Christian Christology Church Dogmatics construal covenant of grace creature’s creaturely realities critique David Bentley Hart deﬁned deﬁnition Dialectical Theology distinction divine revelation Eduard Thurneysen Erich Przywara essence and existence eternal decision fact faith Fate and Idea ﬁnal ﬁnally ﬁnd ﬁrst formulations fulﬁlment God’s act God’s grace God’s relationship God’s revelation God’s Word Gottingen Holy Spirit human action human existence Ihid incarnation inﬂuence insights Jesus Christ justiﬁcation Karl Barth knowledge lectures Luther McCormack means metaphysics Munster natural theology notion occurs ofthe participation philosophy Polarity Protestant Przywara believes Przywara’s analogia entis question reﬂection Reformed relation Religionsphilosophie Roman Catholic theology self-revelation simply Sohngen sola gratia Speciﬁcally stands in continuity tension theologian thinking Thomas Aquinas tion true understanding von Balthasar