 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1895 - 772 pàgines
...involved in the judgment as necessary steps or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to the basis upon which it stands, upon the obvious principle that where a conclusion is indisputable, and could... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1905 - 798 pàgines
...involved in the judgment as necessary steps, or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to the basis upon which it stands, upon the obvious principle that where a conclusion is indisputable, and could... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1870 - 728 pàgines
...all facts involved in it as necessary steps or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion." But such an inference must be inevitable, or it cannot be drawn.... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1883 - 678 pàgines
...controversy so as to include notes not sued on. " It is allowable," says the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, "to reason back from a judgment to the basis on which...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion.' But auch an inference must be inevitable, or it can not be drawn."... | |
 | 1915 - 600 pàgines
...have been adjudicated was submitted to the jury. In Burlen v. Shannon (99 Mass. 200, 203) it was said: "It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion.' But such an inference must be inevitable, or it cannot be drawn."... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1884 - 880 pàgines
...so as to include notes not sued on. " It is allowable," says the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, " to reason back from a judgment to the basis on which...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion. ' But such an inference must be inevitable, or it can not be drawn."... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1884 - 894 pàgines
...reason, back from the judgment to the basis upon which it rests, upon the obvious principle that when a conclusion is indisputable, and could have been...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion. Burlen v. Shannon, 99 Mass. 200. If the precise question at issue... | |
 | 1920 - 1058 pàgines
...basis on which it stands, and, regarding the judgment as a conclusion, and finding it to be one which could have been drawn only from certain premises, the premises are equally res judicata with the conclusion itself." [11] There is a conflict of authority on the question whether... | |
 | Arthur George Sedgwick, Frederick Scott Wait - 1886 - 956 pàgines
...all facts involved in it as necessary steps, or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to...only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputDawley v. Brown, 79 NY 390. See Kelsey v. Ward, 16 Abb. Pr. (NY) 98-103 ; affi'd. 38 NY 83... | |
 | 1894 - 1218 pàgines
...124. It is said by the supreme court of Massachusetts that it is allowable to reason back from the judgment to the basis on which it stands, upon the...indisputable with the conclusion. But such an inference must be inevitable, or it cannot be drawn. Burlen v. Shannon, 99 Mass. 200. It is apparent from the... | |
| |
It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to the basis on which it stands, 'upon the obvious principle that, where a conclusion is indisputable, and could have been drawn only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the... 
