Criteria for Authenticity in Historical-Jesus ResearchHistorical-Jesus research continues to captivate the interests of scholars, and recently, there has been renewed discussion of the criteria for authenticity. The first half of this volume reviews the state of play in historical-Jesus research and examines the criteria in particular. One chapter is devoted to the so-called 'Quests', and a second critically charts the development of the criteria in the light of form criticism. One of the conclusions of this part of the volume is that several criteria, especially those based on linguistics, need re-evaluation. The second half of the volume proposes three new criteria, based upon use of the Greek language. These criteria are: Greek language and its context; textual variance; and discourse features. The criteria are proposed as a way forward in historical-Jesus research. |
Dall'interno del libro
Risultati 1-5 di 13
Pagina 32
With a famous lecture in 1953 by Ernst Käsemann," the 'second' or 'new quest' of the historical Jesus was supposedly inaugurated, which corresponded to the development of redaction criticism." This brief summary leads to the major ...
With a famous lecture in 1953 by Ernst Käsemann," the 'second' or 'new quest' of the historical Jesus was supposedly inaugurated, which corresponded to the development of redaction criticism." This brief summary leads to the major ...
Pagina 47
1953–1988 The analysis that I am offering of a much more multi-faceted development of historical-Jesus research perhaps makes it more understandable how it was that Bultmann's student, Ernst Käsemann, could appear to some to rejuvenate ...
1953–1988 The analysis that I am offering of a much more multi-faceted development of historical-Jesus research perhaps makes it more understandable how it was that Bultmann's student, Ernst Käsemann, could appear to some to rejuvenate ...
Pagina 48
Confirmation for the perspective that I have taken in this chapter comes, of all places, from Käsemann himself. In an essay by Käsemann that deserves to be better known in this discussion, in a section noteworthily entitled “The ...
Confirmation for the perspective that I have taken in this chapter comes, of all places, from Käsemann himself. In an essay by Käsemann that deserves to be better known in this discussion, in a section noteworthily entitled “The ...
Pagina 49
Käsemann's published lecture of 1953 seems in retrospect merely to have given permission for some German scholars, especially those most heavily influenced by the German research in the first half of the century, to re-enter what was in ...
Käsemann's published lecture of 1953 seems in retrospect merely to have given permission for some German scholars, especially those most heavily influenced by the German research in the first half of the century, to re-enter what was in ...
Pagina 52
If anything, utilizing the signposts of such figures as Reimarus, Schweitzer, Bultmann and Käsemann shows only that the tripartite characterization of the quests for the historical Jesus so often cited by scholars has perhaps more of a ...
If anything, utilizing the signposts of such figures as Reimarus, Schweitzer, Bultmann and Käsemann shows only that the tripartite characterization of the quests for the historical Jesus so often cited by scholars has perhaps more of a ...
Cosa dicono le persone - Scrivi una recensione
Nessuna recensione trovata nei soliti posti.
Sommario
| 9 | |
| 12 | |
| 17 | |
| 27 | |
NEW PROPOSALS | 125 |
CONCLUSION | 238 |
Bibliography | 243 |
Index of References | 287 |
Index of Authors | 291 |
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Criteria for Authenticity in Historical-Jesus Research Stanley E. Porter Anteprima non disponibile - 2004 |
Parole e frasi comuni
2nd edn 3rd edn Aramaic Sources Biblical Bultmann C.A. Evans eds Cambridge University Press Casey century Chapter Chilton and C.A. Christology coherence context criteria for authenticity criterion of dissimilarity criterion of embarrassment Discourse Analysis discussion double dissimilarity E.J. Brill E.P. Sanders early Church Eerdmans episode Essays ExpTim form criticism Fortress Press Galilee Göttingen Grand Rapids Greek language Greek New Testament Hebrew Hellenistic Historical Jesus historical-Jesus research idem inscriptions Interpretation Jesus Research Jesusforschung Jewish Josephus JSNTSup JSOT Press Judaism Käsemann Kriterienfrage Leiden linguistic literary Luke Marginal Jew Mark’s Gospel Markan Matthew Meier Mohr Siebeck multilingual multiple attestation noted Oxford Palestine Papyri Parables Philadelphia recent Redaction Criticism regarding repr Roman S.E. Porter SCM Press Semitic SPCK Synoptic Gospels Synoptic Tradition Testament studies textual criticism textual variants Theissen and Winter Theology third quest translation Tübingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht words of Jesus York
Informazioni bibliografiche
| Titolo | Criteria for Authenticity in Historical-Jesus Research Volume 191 di The Library of New Testament Studies |
| Autore | Stanley E. Porter |
| Edizione | ristampa |
| Editore | Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004 |
| ISBN | 0567520986, 9780567520982 |
| Lunghezza | 306 pagine |
| Esporta citazione | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |