Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace
OUP Oxford, 31 mar 2011 - 272 pagine
S. J. Harrison sets out to sketch one answer to a key question in Latin literary history: why did the period c.39-19 BC in Rome produce such a rich range of complex poetical texts, above all in the work of the famous poets Vergil and Horace? Harrison argues that one central aspect of this literary flourishing was the way in which different poetic genres or kinds (pastoral, epic, tragedy, etc.) interacted with each other and that that interaction itself was a prominent literary subject. He explores this issue closely through detailed analysis of passages of the two poets' works between these dates. Harrison opens with an outline of generic theory ancient and modern as a basis for his argument, suggesting how different poetic genres and their partial presence in each other can be detected in the Latin poetry of the first century BC.
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Aeneas Aeneid allusion already amores appears appropriate Archilochus argued Augustan battles bees beginning Caesar Callimachean Callimachus Catullus Chapter clear clearly close collection contemporary context didactic discussion diVerent echoes Eclogue elegiac elegy elements enrichment epic epigram Epode erotic especially example famous framework further future Gallus genre Georgics Greek Harrison Hellenistic hexameter Homeric Horace Horace’s Horatian iambic iambus idea important incorporation interaction issue Italy kind Latin lines literary looks love-elegy lyric matches material metre mode Muses narrative natural noted Odes Odyssey once opening original parallels Parthenius particular passage pastoral perhaps period poem poet poetic poetry political praise presented provides reader recalls recent reference Roman Rome Satires seems seen shows similar song speciWcally story suggests themes Theocritean topic tradition tragic turn Vergil’s Vergilian Wrst