66 ments, which some learned men have adduced, to prove that justification means nothing else than forgiveness of sins, only show that the two distinct blessings are never separately conferred. David, for instance, says "Blessed is the man, to whom "the Lord imputeth not iniquity;"" and Paul observes that, in that passage, "David describeth "the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works." This does not prove, that "not imputing sin," and imputing righteousness," are synonimous terms: but merely, that where God does not impute sin he does impute righteousness; and that he confers the title to eternal life, on all those whom he rescues from eternal death. Indeed exemption from eternal punishment, and a right to an actual and vast-reward, are such distinct things, that one cannot but wonder they should be so generally confounded as they are, in theological discussions.In the Scriptures, however, justification undoubtedly signifies that God hath given the sinner a right and title to eternal life, accounting him righteous by an act of sovereign grace; so that "there is no condemnation for him," but being thus justified," he is made an heir, according to "the hope of eternal life.4" Every attentive reader of the Scriptures, especially of those epistles which contain the last and 'Ps. xxxii. 2. * Rom. iv. 6. 3 Acts xiii. 38, 39. fullest revelation of the truth and will of God to mankind, must observe in them an uniform declaration made, and strenuously insisted on, as of the greatest importance, that "a man is justified by "faith without the deeds of the law." Many learned men have endeavoured to explain all these testimonies of the Mosaick law, as distinguished from the Christian dispensation; and to confine the meaning of them principally to the abrogated ceremonies. But, is "knowledge of sin" by the ceremonial, or by the moral law? Was the ceremonial law "the ministration of death, written "and engraven in stones ?" Did the apostle "know this law to be spiritual," "holy, just, and "good?" Did "he delight in it after the inner "man?" Did the Mosaick rites, or the tenth commandment, convince him that concupiscence was a sin, and slay his hope of justification by the law? Did Christ redeem us from the curse of the ceremonial law alone, by being made a curse for us?-Such questions might easily be multiplied; and each of them formed into a regular argument, demonstrating the falsehood and absurdity of this opinion: but the compass of this Essay does not admit of it, nor is it necessary in so plain a case. No law in the universe can both justify and condemn the same person: if then no man hath always "loved God with all his heart, and "his neighbour as himself," no man can be justi & 2 Cor. iii. 7. 2 Rom. vii. 3 Gal. iii. 13. fied according to the works of the moral law, for this most obvious and conclusive reason, because all are exposed to condemnation for breaking it. If , no human action be more excellent than the law requires; then none of our works of righteousness can do any thing to reverse the condemnation that our sins have incurred: and if the best of our good works come short of perfection, and our best days are chequered with many sins; then we must continue to accumulate guilt and condemnation, as long as we remain under the law, and are judged according to it. So that by no works of any law whatever, can a transgressor of that law be justified in the sight of God. These considerations may prepare our minds for attending more carefully to the language of the apostle, in discoursing on this subject. He constantly insists upon it, that a man is justified by, or through, faith, and not by the deeds of the law. He even says without hesitation. "To him that "worketh not, but believeth in him that justifieth "the ungodly, his faith is counted to him for righ"teousness." And he carefully distinguishes this way of justification from that by works; nay, opposes the one to the other as incompatible." Because the law worketh wrath;-therefore it is by faith, that it might be by grace." "And if by grace, then it is no more of works; other"wise grace is no more grace.""-For this reason, ' Rom. iv. 5. 2 Rom. iv. 14-16. xi. 6. all they whom God justifieth are considered as ungodly. True faith is indeed the effect of regeneration, an important part of true godliness, and inseparable from all other holy exercises of the soul towards God: yet the believer, considered as he is in himself, according to the holy law, is liable to condemnation as ungodly; and is justified solely and entirely, as viewed in Christ, according to the gospel. ، Even James who in another sense shows that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only," illustrates his doctrine by the example of Abraham, who was "justified by works, when "he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar:" and he then adds, "Seest thou, how faith wrought "with his works, and by works was faith made perfect; and the Scripture was fulfilled which "saith Abraham believed God, and it was im puted to him for righteousness."" Now these words were spoken many years before Abraham was called to sacrifice Isaac, indeed, before Isaac was born." James therefore evidently meant, that the true believer proves his profession to be sincere and his faith living, by the fruits of holy obedience; and is thus justified before men on earth, and will be justified before the world at the last day, from that charge of hypocrisy, which will be substantiated against all those who " say "they have faith, and have not works." Unless • Gen. xv. 6. 'James ii, 20-26. we admit this interpretation, we shall find as much difficulty in reconciling James with himself, as some have done in reconciling Paul with him. For he adduces the same example, and quotes the same Scripture, in illustration of his point, that St. Paul does: and he supposed, that he had confirmed the true doctrine of justification by faith, in thus distinguishing living from dead faith; and in showing that no faith could justify a man before God, which did not prove itself genuine, and justify the possessor before his neighbours, by influencing him to the practice of good works according to the opportunity afforded him. But the general doctrine, that, a man is justi'fied in the sight of God by faith alone,' is too plain to need much proof. They who regard the epistles of St. Paul must know, that he not only 'teaches this doctrine, but likewise bestows much pains in establishing it by various arguments, illustrations, and examples. He declares that no man is justified in any other way:"" that "they, who "seek righteousness, as it were, by the works of "the law," stumble and fall, and receive no benefit from Christ and the gospel; and that " if any man, or angel, should preach any other -66 that " gospel he would be accursed.4" Indeed those Scriptures, which do not immediately relate to justification, continually speak of faith as the grand 'Gal. ii. 11, 12. 2 Rom. ix. 30-33. x. 3-11. 4 Gal. i, 8-10. |