Immagini della pagina
PDF
ePub

say that David was "worth ten thousand of them," 2 Sam. xviii. 3, we may well allow the Lord Christ, and so what he did and suffered, to be more than us all, and all that we can do and suffer.

There are also sundry other mistakes that concur unto that part of the charge against the imputation of the righteousness of Christ unto us, which we have now considered. I say of his righteousness; for the apostle in this case useth those two words, δικαίωμα and ὑπακοή, "righteousness" and "obedience," as looduvaμouvra,-of the same signification, Rom. v. 18, 19. Such are these:-that remission of sin and justification are the same, or that justification consisteth only in the remission of sin;-that faith itself, as our act and duty, seeing it is the condition of the covenant, is imputed unto us for righteousness;-or that we have a personal, inherent righteousness of our own, that one way or other is our righteousness before God unto justification; either a condition it is, or a disposition unto it, or hath a congruity in deserving the grace of justification, or a downright merit of condignity thereof: for all these are but various expressions of the same thing, according unto the variety of the conceptions of the minds of men about it. But they have been all considered and removed in our precedent discourses.

To close this argument, and our vindication of it, and therewithal to obviate an objection, I do acknowledge that our blessedness and life eternal is, in the Scripture, ofttimes ascribed unto the death of Christ. But,-1. It is so xar' ox,—as the principal cause of the whole, and as that without which no imputation of obedience could have justified us; for the penalty of the law was indispensably to be undergone. 2. It is so xarà ouyyéverav,-not exclusively unto all obedience, whereof mention is made in other places, but as that whereunto it is inseparably conjoined. "Christus in vita passivam habuit actionem; in morte passionem activam sustinuit; dum salutem operaretur in medio terræ," Bernard. And so it is also ascribed unto his resurrection zar' vdev, with respect unto evidence and manifestation; but the death of Christ exclusively, as unto his obedience, is nowhere asserted as the cause of eternal life, comprising that exceeding weight of glory wherewith it is accompanied.

Hitherto we have treated of and vindicated the imputation of the active obedience of Christ unto us, as the truth of it was deduced from the preceding argument about the obligation of the law of creation. I shall now briefly confirm it with other reasons and testi

monies:

1. That which Christ, the mediator and surety of the covenant, did do in obedience unto God, in the discharge and performance of his office, that he did for us; and that is imputed unto us. This hath been proved already, and it hath too great an evidence of truth to be

denied. He was "born to us, given to us," Isa. ix. 6; for "what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh; that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us," Rom. viii. 3, 4. Whatever is spoken of the grace, love, and purpose of God in sending or giving his Son, or of the love, grace, and condescension of the Son in coming and undertaking of the work of redemption designed unto him, or of the office itself of a mediator or surety, gives testimony unto this assertion; yea, it is the fundamental principle of the gospel, and of the faith of all that truly believe. As for those by whom the divine person and satisfaction of Christ are denied, whereby they evert the whole work of his mediation, we do not at present consider them. Wherefore what he so did is to be inquired into. And,

(1.) The Lord Christ, our mediator and surety, was, in his human nature, made rò véuov," under the law," Gal. iv. 4. That he was vóμov,not so for himself, by the necessity of his condition, we have proved before. It was, therefore, for us. But as made under the law, he yielded obedience unto it; this, therefore, was for us, and is imputed unto us. The exception of the Socinians, that it is the judicial law only that is intended, is too frivolous to be insisted on; for he was made under that law whose curse we are delivered from. And if we are delivered only from the curse of the law of Moses, wherein they contend that there was neither promises nor threatening of eternal things, of any thing beyond this present life, we are still in our sins, under the curse of the moral law, notwithstanding all that he hath done for us. It is excepted, with more colour of sobriety, that he was made under the law only as to the curse of it. But it is plain in the text that Christ was made under the law as we are under it. He was "made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law." And if he was not made so as we are, there is no consequence from his being made under it unto our redemption from it. But we were so under the law, as not only to be obnoxious unto the curse, but so as to be obliged unto all the obedience that it required; as hath been proved. And if the Lord Christ hath redeemed us only from the curse of it by undergoing it, leaving us in ourselves to answer its obligation unto obedience, we are not freed nor delivered. And the expression of "under the law" doth in the first place, and properly, signify being under the obligation of it unto obedience, and consequentially only with a respect unto the curse. Gal. iv. 21, "Tell me, ye that desire to be inò vóμor,"-"under the law." They did not desire to be under the curse of the law, but only its obligation unto obedience; which, in all usage of speech, is the first proper sense of that expression. Wherefore, the Lord Christ being

made under the law for us, he yielded perfect obedience unto it for us; which is therefore imputed unto us. For that what he did was done for us, depends solely on imputation.

(2.) As he was thus made under the law, so he did actually fulfil it by his obedience unto it. So he testifieth concerning himself,“Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil," Matt. v. 17. These words of our Lord Jesus Christ, as recorded by the evangelist, the Jews continually object against the Christians, as contradictory to what they pretend to be done by him,--namely, that he hath destroyed and taken away the law. And Maimonides, in his treatise, "De Fundamentis Legis," hath many blasphemous reflections on the Lord Christ, as a false prophet in this matter. But the reconciliation is plain and easy. There was a twofold law given unto the church,—the moral and the ceremonial law. The first, as we have proved, is of an eternal obligation; the other was given only for a time. That the latter of these was to be taken away and abolished, the apostle proves with invincible testimonies out of the Old Testament against the obstinate Jews, in his Epistle unto the Hebrews. Yet was it not to be taken away without its accomplishment, when it ceased of itself. Wherefore, our Lord Christ did no otherwise dissolve or destroy that law but by the accomplishment of it; and so he did put an end unto it, as is fully declared, Eph. ii. 14-16. But the law xar' ¿ğox, that which obligeth all men unto obedience unto God always, he came not καταλύσαι, to destroy,that is ἀθετῆσαι, to abolish it, as an ἀθέτησις is ascribed unto the Mosaical law, Heb. ix. 26 (in the same sense is the word used, Matt. xxiv. 2, xxvi. 61, xxvii. 40; Mark xiii. 2, xiv. 58, xv. 29; Luke xxi. 6; Acts v. 38, 39, vi. 14; Rom. xiv. 20; 2 Cor. v. 1; Gal. ii. 18, mostly with an accusative case, of the things spoken of), or naτapyñoaι, which the apostle denies to be done by Christ, and faith in him. Rom. iii. 31, Νόμον οὖν καταργοῦμεν διὰ τῆς πίστεως; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ νόμον ἱστῶμεν — Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid; yea, we establish the law." Nópoviorávaι Νόμον ἱστάναι is to confirm its obligation unto obedience; which is done by faith only, with respect unto the moral law; the other being evacuated as unto any power of obliging unto obedience. This, therefore, is the law which our Lord Christ affirms that he came 66 not to destroy;" so he expressly declares in his ensuing discourse, showing both its power of obliging us always unto obedience, and giving an exposition of it. This law the Lord Christ came πληρῶσαι. Πληρῶσαι τὸν νόμον, in the Scripture, is the same with surλñoa, sòv vóμor in other writers; that is, to yield full, perfect obedience unto the commands of the law, whereby they are absolutely fulfilled. Пanpoaι vómov is not to make the law perfect; for it was always vópos réλeos,-a "perfect law,"

VOL. V

[ocr errors]

18

وو

James i. 25; but to yield perfect obedience unto it: the same that our Saviour calls λnão ãσav dixaoσúvny, Matt. iii. 15, “to fulfil all righteousness;" that is, by obedience unto all God's commands and institutions, as is evident in the place. So the apostle useth the same expression, Rom. xiii. 8, " He that loveth another hath fulfilled the law."

2. It is a vain exception, that Christ fulfilled the law by his doctrine, in the exposition of it. The opposition between the words and xaraλúra,,—“to fulfil" and " to destroy,"-will admit of no such sense; and our Saviour himself expounds this "fulfilling of the law," by doing the commands of it, Matt. v. 19. Wherefore, the Lord Christ as our mediator and surety fulfilling the law, by yielding perfect obedience thereunto, he did it for us; and to us it is imputed.

This is plainly affirmed by the apostle, Rom. v. 18, 19, “ Therefore, as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners; so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." The full plea from, and vindication of, this testimony, I refer unto its proper place in the testimonies given unto the imputation of the righteousness of Christ unto our justification in general. Here I shall only observe, that the apostle expressly and in terms affirms that "by the obedience of Christ we are made righteous," or justified; which we cannot be but by the imputation of it unto us. I have met with nothing that had the appearance of any sobriety for the eluding of this express testimony, but only that by the obedience of Christ his death and sufferings are intended, wherein he was obedient unto God; as the apostle saith, he was "obedient unto death, even the death of the cross," Phil. ii. 8. But yet there is herein no colour of probability. For,—(1.) It is acknowledged that there was such a near conjunction and alliance between the obedience of Christ and his sufferings, that though they may be distinguished, yet can they not be separated. He suffered in the whole course of his obedience, from the womb to the cross; and he obeyed in all his sufferings unto the last moment wherein he expired. But yet are they really things distinct, as we have proved; and they were so in him who "learned obedience by the things that he suffered," Heb. v. 8. (2.) In this place, [Rom. v.] iraxon, verse 19, and dixaínua, verse 18, are the same, obedience and righteousness. By the righteousness of one," and "by the obedience of one," are the same. But suffering, as suffering, is not dixaiaua, is not righteousness; for if it were, then every one that suffers what is due to him should be righteous, and so be justified, even the devil himself. (3.) The righteousness and obedience here intended are opposed rỹ rαpañτúμarı,—to the of

[ocr errors]

fence: "By the offence of one." But the offence intended was an actual transgression of the law; so is аpára, a fall from, or a fall in, the course of obedience. Wherefore the dixaínua, or righteousness, must be an actual obedience unto the commands of the law, or the force of the apostle's reasoning and antithesis cannot be understood. (4.) Particularly, it is such an obedience as is opposed unto the disobedience of Adam,-" one man's disobedience," "one man's obedience;"-but the disobedience of Adam was an actual transgression of the law: and therefore the obedience of Christ here intended was his active obedience unto the law;-which is that we plead for. And I shall not at present farther pursue the argument, because the force of it, in the confirmation of the truth contended for, will be included in those that follow.

CHAPTER XIII.

The nature of justification proved from the difference of the covenants.

THAT which we plead in the third place unto our purpose is, the difference between the two covenants. And herein it may be observed,

1. That by the two covenants I understand those which were absolutely given unto the whole church, and were all to bring it ɛis reλesórnra,―unto a complete and perfect state; that is, the covenant of works, or the law of our creation as it was given unto us, with promises and threatenings, or rewards and punishments, annexed unto it; and the covenant of grace, revealed and proposed in the first promise. As unto the covenant of Sinai, and the new testament as actually confirmed in the death of Christ, with all the spiritual privileges thence emerging, and the differences between them, they belong not unto our present argument.

2. The whole entire nature of the covenant of works consisted in this, that upon our personal obedience, according unto the law and rule of it, we should be accepted with God, and rewarded with him. Herein the essence of it did consist; and whatever covenant proceedeth on these terms, or hath the nature of them in it, however it may be varied with additions or alterations, is the same covenant still, and not another. As in the renovation of the promise wherein the essence of the covenant of grace was contained, God did ofttimes make other additions unto it (as unto Abraham and David), yet was it still the same covenant for the substance of it, and not another; so

« IndietroContinua »