The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and ReligionKnopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 12 feb 2013 - 528 pagine NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • The #1 bestselling author of The Anxious Generation and acclaimed social psychologist challenges conventional thinking about morality, politics, and religion in a way that speaks to conservatives and liberals alike—a “landmark contribution to humanity’s understanding of itself” (The New York Times Book Review). Drawing on his twenty-five years of groundbreaking research on moral psychology, Jonathan Haidt shows how moral judgments arise not from reason but from gut feelings. He shows why liberals, conservatives, and libertarians have such different intuitions about right and wrong, and he shows why each side is actually right about many of its central concerns. In this subtle yet accessible book, Haidt gives you the key to understanding the miracle of human cooperation, as well as the curse of our eternal divisions and conflicts. If you’re ready to trade in anger for understanding, read The Righteous Mind. |
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Anteprima limitata - 2012 |
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Anteprima non disponibile - 2013 |
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Anteprima non disponibile - 2013 |
Parole e frasi comuni
ability actions adaptive American animals arguments asked Authority become began begin behavior believe better brain called chapter claim cognitive concerns conservatives cooperation create cultural Democrats described developed effect elephant emotions equality ethic evolution evolved example experience explain fairness feel figure foundation genes give group selection groups Haidt happen harm hive human idea important individuals intuitions it's judgment kind lead less liberal live look Loyalty major mean minds moral nature original parties person play political Press principle psychology question reasoning religion religious response rider rules seems selection selfish sense shared social society sometimes story subjects theory things tion triggers trying turn understand United University values wrong York