 | Harrison B. Prosper, Michael Danilov - 2001 - 430 pagine
...Classically, substitution of this gauge choice into S[x, h] leaves the gaugefixed action T r (1.25) Quantum mechanically, the story is more subtle. Instead...fixing. When this is done correctly, one finds that in general <f) does not decouple from the answer. Only for the special case d = 26 does the quantum... | |
 | Vladimir G. Ivancevic, Tijana T. Ivancevic - 2006 - 856 pagine
...Classically, substitution of this gauge choice into S[x, h} leaves the gauge-fixed action =? I < (2.512) Quantum mechanically, the story is more subtle. Instead...fixing. When this is done correctly, one finds that in general <p does not decouple from the answer. Only for the special case d = 26 does the quantum... | |
 | Vladimir G. Ivancevic - 2007 - 1346 pagine
...of this gauge choice into S[x, h] leaves the gauge-fixed action S = ^ j far\apdax • dpx. (6.300) Quantum mechanically, the story is more subtle. Instead...fixing. When this is done correctly, one finds that in general 0 does not decouple from the answer. Only for the special case d = 26 does the quantum analysis... | |
| |
Quantum mechanically, the story is more subtle. Instead of eliminating h via its classical field equations, one should perform a Feynman path integral, using standard machinery to deal with the local symmetries and gauge fixing. When this is done correctly,... 