The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence
Duke University Press, 1993 - 317 pagine
The Constitution Besieged offers a compelling reinterpretation of one of the most notorious periods in American constitutional history. In the decades following the Civil War, federal and state judges struck down as unconstitutional a great deal of innovative social and economic legislation. Scholars have traditionally viewed this as the work of a conservative judiciary more interested in promoting laissez-faire economics than in interpreting the Constitution. Howard Gillman challenges this scholarly orthodoxy by showing how these judges were in fact observing a long-standing constitutional prohibition against "class legislation." By reviewing unfamiliar state cases and legal commentary, and by providing fresh interpretations of familiar Supreme Court cases, Gillman uncovers a fascinating - and long forgotten - legal tradition. In this richly textured historical narrative, we see how American judges once worked to insure that legislative power be used only to promote the public good, and not to benefit certain classes or burden their market competitors. Beyond shedding new light on this jurisprudence, Gillman also links it to larger debates in the political system, debates traced to concerns about factional politics expressed by the country's founders and to the Jacksonian assault on special privileges. This tradition came under siege with the intensification of class conflict at the turn of the century, and Gillman carefully documents its demise. He details how industrialization undermined assumptions about the fairness of capitalist social relations, and how this led increasing numbers of people to question the requirement that the state remain neutral in matters of class conflict - thus leaving it to a stalwart judiciary to protect "a Constitution besieged." A major contribution to an understanding of this important period in the history of the Supreme Court, Gillman's work stands as a landmark in revisionist accounts of the "Lochner era." Gillman's study represents the kind of paradigm-shift that will undoubtedly affect a wide range of scholarly activity for some time to come. The broad scope of this work makes it essential reading for those interested in American political thought, the development of the American state, the relationship between law and social change, and contemporary debates about the original intent of the framers of the Constitution and the proper role of the judiciary in American politics.
Cosa dicono le persone - Scrivi una recensione
Nessuna recensione trovata nei soliti posti.
CHAPTER ONE The Origins of Lochner Era Police Powers
Political Equality and Market Liberty in Jacksonian America 3 3
CHAPTER TWO The Master Principle of Neutrality and
Industrialization Class Conflict and the Neutral State
CHAPTER THREE The Old Constitutionalism and the
Labor Legislation the Neutral Polity and the Bumpy Road to Lochner
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Abolitionism Adkins American Law Review arbitrary argued argument benefit capital capitalist class conflict class legislation conception constitutional law constitutionalism Cooley corporate decision Democracy Democratic discussion dissenters distinction due process economic employers equal protection clause exercise favor federal Foner Fourteenth Amendment freedom freedom of contract groups Harvard Law Review health and safety hours of labor Ibid ideology illegitimate individual industry interest interference issue Jacksonian Jacksonian Democracy judges judicial justices Labor Legislation laissez-faire Law Journal legislative power legislature legitimate liberty of contract limits Lochner Lochner era majority market liberty maximum hours laws ment minimum wage minimum wage laws morals n.io neutral nineteenth century oleomargarine opinion particular persons Plaintiff in Error police powers jurisprudence principle privileges production prohibiting promote public health railroads reasonable regulation republican social society statute Supreme Court tion traditional upheld welfare well-being women workers Yale Law Journal Yick Wo York