49. COMPARISON OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF PEACE AND SECURITY IN VARIOUS AREAS-Continued SEC. 2. The United States regards as vital Cuba (a) to prevent by whatever means may (b) to prevent in Cuba the creation or (c) to work with the Organization of This resolution shall expire when the This resolution shall expire when the created by action of the United Nations or SEC. 2. The President is authorized to This joint resolution shall expire when the 50. ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT JOHNSON, AUGUST 12, 1964 In Viet-Nam, too, we work for world order. For 10 years, through the Eisenhower administration, the Kennedy administration, and this administration, we have had one consistent aim observance of the 1954 agreements which guaranteed the independence of South Viet-Nam. That independence has been the consistent target of aggression and terror. For 10 years our response to these attacks has followed a consistent pattern: First, that the South Vietnamese have the basic responsibility for the defense of their own freedom. Second, we would engage our strength and our resources to whatever extent needed to help others repel aggression. Now, there are those who would have us depart from these tested principles. They have a variety of viewpoints. All of them, I am sure, you have heard in your local community. Some say that we should withdraw from South Viet-Nam, that we have lost almost 200 lives there in the last 4 years, and we should come home. But the United States cannot and must not and will not turn aside and allow the freedom of a brave people to be handed over to Communist tyranny. This alternative is strategically unwise, we think, and it is morally unthinkable. Some others are eager to enlarge the conflict. They call upon us to supply American boys to do the job that Asian boys should do. They ask us to take reckless action which might risk the lives of millions and engulf much of Asia and certainly threaten the peace of the entire world. Moreover, such action would offer no solution at all to the real problem of Viet-Nam. America can and America will meet any wider challenge from others, but our aim in Viet-Nam, as in the rest of the world, is to help restore the peace and to reestablish a decent order. The course that we have chosen will require wisdom and endurance. But let no one doubt for a moment that we have the resources and the will to follow this course as long as it may take. No one should think for a moment that we will be worn down, nor will we be driven out, and we will not be provoked into rashness; but we will continue to meet aggression with firmness and unprovoked attack with measured reply. That is the meaning of the prompt reaction of our destroyers to unprovoked attack. That is the meaning of the positive reply of our aircraft to a repetition of that attack. That is the meaning of the resolution passed by your Congress with 502 votes in favor and only 2 opposed. That is the meaning of the national unity that we have shown to all the world last week. There is another consideration. Wherever the forces of freedom are engaged, no one who commands the power of nuclear weapons can escape his responsibility for the life of our people and the life of your children. It has never been the policy of any American to sympathetically or systematically place in hazard the life of this nation by threatening 130 30 SOUTHEAST ASIA AND VIETNAM 49. COMPARISON OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF PEACE AND SECURITY IN VARIOUS AREAS-Continued SEC. 2. The United States regards as vital This resolution shall expire when the This resolution shall expire when the SEC. 2. The President is authorized to This joint resolution shall expire when the 50. ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT JOHNSON, AUGUST 12, 1964 In Viet-Nam, too, we work for world order. For 10 years, through the Eisenhower administration, the Kennedy administration, and this administration, we have had one consistent aim observance of the 1954 agreements which guaranteed the independence of South Viet-Nam. That independence has been the consistent target of aggression and terror. For 10 years our response to these attacks has followed a consistent pattern: First, that the South Vietnamese have the basic responsibility for the defense of their own freedom. Second, we would engage our strength and our resources to whatever extent needed to help others repel aggression. Now, there are those who would have us depart from these tested principles. They have a variety of viewpoints. All of them, I am sure, you have heard in your local community. Some say that we should withdraw from South Viet-Nam, that we have lost almost 200 lives there in the last 4 years, and we should come home. But the United States cannot and must not and will not turn aside and allow the freedom of a brave people to be handed over to Communist tyranny. This alternative is strategically unwise, we think, and it is morally unthinkable. Some others are eager to enlarge the conflict. They call upon us. to supply American boys to do the job that Asian boys should do. They ask us to take reckless action which might risk the lives of millions and engulf much of Asia and certainly threaten the peace of the entire world. Moreover, such action would offer no solution at all to the real problem of Viet-Nam. America can and America will meet any wider challenge from others, but our aim in Viet-Nam, as in the rest of the world, is to help restore the peace and to reestablish a decent order. The course that we have chosen will require wisdom and endurance. But let no one doubt for a moment that we have the resources and the will to follow this course as long as it may take. No one should think for a moment that we will be worn down, nor will we be driven out, and we will not be provoked into rashness; but we will continue to meet aggression with firmness and unprovoked attack with measured reply. That is the meaning of the prompt reaction of our destroyers to unprovoked attack. That is the meaning of the positive reply of our aircraft to a repetition of that attack. That is the meaning of the resolution passed by your Congress with 502 votes in favor and only 2 opposed. That is the meaning of the national unity that we have shown to all the world last week. There is another consideration. Wherever the forces of freedom are engaged, no one who commands the power of nuclear weapons can escape his responsibility for the life of our people and the life of your children. It has never been the policy of any American to sympathetically or systematically place in hazard the life of this nation by threatening 49. COMPARISON OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF PEACE AND SECURITY IN VARIOUS AREAS-Continued Southeast Asia the President, as Commander-in-Chief, to This resolution shall expire when the Cuba (a) to prevent by whatever means may (b) to prevent in Cuba the creation or (c) to work with the Organization of Formosa thorized to employ the Armed Forces of This resolution shall expire when the created by action of the United Nations or SEC. 2. The President is authorized to This joint resolution shall expire when the |