The Politics of Immorality in Ancient RomeCambridge University Press, 9 mag 2002 - 229 pagine The decadence and depravity of the ancient Romans are a commonplace of serious history, popular novels and spectacular films. This book is concerned not with the question of how immoral the ancient Romans were but why the literature they produced is so preoccupied with immorality. The modern image of immoral Rome derives from ancient accounts which are largely critical rather than celebratory. Upper-class Romans habitually accused one another of the most lurid sexual and sumptuary improprieties. Historians and moralists lamented the vices of their contemporaries and mourned for the virtues of a vanished age. Far from being empty commonplaces these assertions constituted a powerful discourse through which Romans negotiated conflicts and tensions in their social and political order. This study proceeds by a detailed examination of a wide range of ancient texts (all of which are translated) exploring the dynamics of their rhetoric, as well as the ends to which they were deployed. Roman moralising discourse, the author suggests, may be seen as especially concerned with the articulation of anxieties about gender, social status and political power. Individual chapters focus on adultery, effeminacy, the immorality of the Roman theatre, luxurious buildings and the dangers of pleasure. This book should appeal to students and scholars of classical literature and ancient history. It will also attract anthropologists and social and cultural historians. |
Sommario
A moral revolution? The law against adultery | 34 |
reading the body | 63 |
representations of actors and the theatre | 98 |
rhetoric building and social | 137 |
Prodigal pleasures | 175 |
I | 209 |
98 | 219 |
225 | |
Altre edizioni - Visualizza tutto
Parole e frasi comuni
according accused actors adultery alleged ancient appear argues associated attacks attempts attitudes Augustus authority behaviour building Caesar century chapter Cicero citizens claim concerned contrast culture describes discussion distinction early effeminacy effeminate elder elite emperor emphasises example excessive female forms forthcoming Greek homosexual husband immorality imply important individuals instance interest Italy kind late republic later literary literature lives London luxury male means moral moralists nature Nero observes origins Oxford particular passive performance perhaps Plautus plays pleasure Pliny political position practice presented principate references relationship represented republic rhetorical role Roman moralists Rome seems seen senate Seneca sexual similar slaves social society sometimes stage status Suet suggests Tacitus texts theatre tradition Veyne virtue wealth wife woman women writing