 | John Frederick Archbold - 1838 - 648 pągines
...inquiry. Ruddock v. Smith, 1 Dowl. 467. *CHAFTER VI. PLEAS TO THE JURISDICTION. IT is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...jurisdiction of an inferior court, but that which is so expressly alleged. 1 Saund. 74. Bac. Abr. Pleas, E. 1. In transitory actions, the courts of Westminster... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1843
...in Wales, county palatine of Chester, and the court of Ely — Pigye v. Gardner, 1 Lev. 208 : for, " nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so ; nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly... | |
 | 1852
...645 ; William* v. Germaine, 7 B. & C. 468.) The rule of pleading the jurisdiction of Inferior Courts is, "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior but that which specially appears to be so : and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within... | |
 | 1848
...expressed thus :—" The old rule I ordinary courts are bound to obey the process delifor jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of the Superior Courts but that which specially appears to be so ; nothing islntended to be within the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Edmund Saunders - 1845
...of a judgment in an inferior court must f/'\ ideo considcratum est per curiam, otherwise it is bad. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so; nor within the jurisdiction of an in*[ 75 ] entries of judgments in... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court, John Lansing Wendell - 1846
...same footing as they would on error from a superior court. They then add and the rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the...within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but thai which is so expressly alleged, and though the court of the county palatine is inferior to this... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1841
...adjudged bad, and properly quashed. The gem al rule in respect to the jurisdiction of courts seems to be. "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...specially appears to be so ; and on the contrary, nothing will be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly... | |
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1847 - 278 pągines
...the establishment of inferior courts, it being an established rule of our common law, that,al though nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...court, but that which specially appears to be so, yet, on the other hand, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court,... | |
| |
The rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court... 
