...62 Mo. 516; Gates v. Tunten, 89 Mo. 13; Schad v. Sharp, 95 Mo. 578, 8 SW Rep. 549. "Nothing should be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior...court but that which specially appears to be so." Id. Such courts proceed by right, and not by wrong, and the presumption that they do so will attend...

...the acquisition of Jurisdiction, or how it was acquired, then jurisdiction is presumed; for the rule is that 'nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but which specially appears to be so.' " In Schad v. Sharp, supra, an ejectment case, the jurisdiction...

...court of general jurisdiction, it will be presumed to have exercised its jurisdiction rightfully, and "nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but which specially appears to be so." Gates v. Tmten, 89 Mo. 18; Huxley v. Harrold, 62 Mo. 516. Enough,...

...indictment. In the argument in Peacock v. Bell (1 Saund. 73), the rule of jurisdiction is said to be " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged ; " and this statement of Opinion of the Court, per AKDBEWS, J. the rule has been...

...Ford. In Peacock, v. Bell (1 Saund. 73), it is said that " nothing shall be intended to be without the jurisdiction of a Superior Court but that which...jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged." This statement of the rule lias been frequently approved. The rule has been...

...Gratt. 37 ; Hill v. Woodward, 78 Va. 765. Every intendment is made to support the judgment, and the rule is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court — that is, a court of general jurisdiction — but that which specially appears to be so. Broom's...

...limited jurisdiction. Schufeldt v. Buckley, 45 Ill. 223; Wells v. Mason, 4 Scam. 84. Nothing sball be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged. This language has been so often repeated by courts and text-writers as to have...

...common law and in chancery; and when so acting it is a court of superior jurisdiction, and the rule is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of such a court but that which appears to be. Where a court of superior jurisdiction exercises statutory...

[ El contingut d’aquesta pàgina està restringit ]

...acts and judgments of courts of general jurisdiction or courts of record. We are told that nothing is intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but what specially appears to be so, and nothing is intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior...