 the rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court...  The New York Supplement - Pàgina 1361917Visualització completa - Sobre aquest llibre
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1852 - 750 pàgines
...juritdictio*.} The general rule its to jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be oat of th* jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially...jurisdiction of an inferior court, but that which ib so expressly alleged. 1 Saund. 74. line. Abr. Pleat, K. 1 . Bat where an inferior conrt derives... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1852 - 616 pàgines
...out of the jurisdiction of the superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; nothing is intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is expressly alleged."3 In the recent case of Gosset v. Howard,4 the Court of Exchequer Chamber held,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1854 - 750 pàgines
...Bell, 1 Saund. 74 (see 1 Wms. Saund. 74 a),—" The rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior...court, but that which specially appears to be so;" " nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so... | |
 | Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire - 1919 - 274 pàgines
...stated as follows : 44 The Liverpool Court of Passage The rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior...Inferior Court but that which is so expressly alleged. . . . Another distinction is that whereas the judgement of a Superior Court unreversed is conclusive... | |
 | 1856 - 598 pàgines
...quoted with approbation the rule to be found in Peacock v. Bell, (1 Saund. 73), " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior...court, but that which specially appears to be so ; and nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is expressly... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger, John Scott - 1846 - 1156 pàgines
...down in the argument of Peacock v.Bell(e), — " The rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ;" " nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is... | |
 | Rollin Carlos Hurd - 1858 - 714 pàgines
...the rule as to pleading is well expressed thus : ' The rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ;' ' nothing shall ,be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1858 - 898 pàgines
...in favour of judicial proceedings. Thus, it is an undoubted rule of pleading, that, nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which is so expressly alleged; and consequently the records in the Courts of Counties Palatine, they being... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1866 - 610 pàgines
...that the Municipal Court of the city of Chicago was a Superior Court, and that nothing shall be held to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court, but that which specially appears to be so. It was further distinctly held in that case, that " the act creating the Municipal Court of the city... | |
| |
