...is implied by his view that only those properties are essential "which admit neither intensification nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong...to all bodies within the reach of our experiments" (1946, 398). 6 But, according to Hegel, even the second case still represents an inferior level of...

...the same causes. And the third states that those qualities of bodies which admit of neither intension nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of experiment, are to be accounted the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever. The question arises,...

...section "A Mathematical Model for Evaluating Fatigue in Cancer"). 3. The qualities of bodies . . . which are found to belong to all bodies within the...the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever. The application of this third rule is not as easy as it appears. What are the "universal qualities...

...reason in deciding such a crucial matter: The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intensification nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong...our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal properties of all bodies whatever. (1687, p. 398) The properties that this method arrives at are nevertheless...

...must, as far as possible, assign the same causes," and most important, "the qualities of bodies . . . which are found to belong to all bodies within the...the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever" (rules 1-3. K 2:550-5/M 2:398-400)." As Newton put it, we are not "to recede from the analogy of Nature,...

...Rule of Reasoning: the "analogy of Nature" permits the extrapolation from qualities of bodies that "are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments" to "all bodies whatsoever." I am certainly not endorsing this rule as Newton expressed it. I mention...

...the second criterion specified by the Rule: for a property to be "universal" quality, it has "to be found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments.'" Interestingly, even on this second criterion, shape or figure no longer counts as universal according...

...possible assign the same causes;" rule 3: "The quality of bodies, which admits neither intensification, nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong...the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever;" and rule 4: "In experimental philosophy, we are to look upon propositions inferred by general induction...

...thought he was describing. The third rule is: "The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intention nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong...the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever. " Burtt asks on what basis can it possibly be legitimate to generalize "ad infinitum" from immediate,...

...these to go beyond strict empirical principles. "The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intension nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong...be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies 218 whatsoever." Is not this a highly speculative assumption of the Cartesian sort, that it is legitimate...